PROM Detail

Intermediate Care for Older People Bed-Based PREM
  • Basic Information
  • Detailed Information
  • Domains
  • Psychometrics

Basic Information

Abbreviated name
IC-PREM-Bed
Full name
Intermediate Care for Older People Bed-Based PREM
Items ?
The number of questions in the survey
15
Short description
A pair of PREMs have been designed specifically to evaluate the delivery of person-centred care for older people in intermediate care services
PCCC or QoL? ?
This compendium contains patient-reported measures that are either designed to specifically measure aspects of Person Centred Co-Ordinated Care (P3C), or alternatively tools that are designed to measure some aspect of Quality of Life (QoL) or Health Related Quality of Life (hrQoL). All the measures in this compendium have been broadly categorised into one of those two concepts.
Person Centred Coordinated Care
Main Domains Measured ?
This is the key domains that the measure is targeting.
Goal Setting, Empowerment, Self-Management, Care-Planning, Transitions, Decision Making, Communication
Type of measure ?
The measures in this compendium can take a variety of forms. Generally, they will be either Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) or Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM). However, we have also included a few measures that are completed by proxy-individual (PROXY), which are useful in instances where the respondent cannot answer directly (e.g. dementia or end of life). Sometimes, these measures can even be a composite of these types, and target both experiences and outcomes – we have labelled these measures “PROEMs”.
PREM
Respondent ?
The person that fills in the questionnaire - e.g. patient, Health Care Professional, or proxy (normally a carer or family member)
Patients

Detailed Information

Year developed ?
The year in which the measure was first published.
2015
Country developed in ?
The main country[s] in which the measure was first developed.
UK
Original publication ?
The publication in which the measure was originally published.
Search Citations of Original Reference
Target condition ?
The measures can be either generic or disease specific (e.g. Diabetes, Heart Failure)
Older People
Main context tested in ?
The main context in which the measure has been developed and used (E.g. Hopital, General Practice etc).
Older people in bed-based services
Main countries used in ?
The main countries in which the measure has been developed and used.
UK
Target age ?
e.g. Adults, Children, Elderly
Older people
Main uses of measure ?
The context in which the measure is most often used – e.g. clinical trials; national surveys.
Designed as a measure of user experience and as a practical way to measure person-centred, integrated care in IC settings.
Used in UK? ?
Whether the instrument has been tested and validated within a UK healthcare context.
Yes
Language
English
Aggregable
Yes

Domains

Domain description
Goal Setting, Empowerment, Self-Management, Care-Planning, Transitions, Decision Making, Communication
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2
6
2
1
1
8
1
4
2
4
1
Goal setting
Empowerment/activation
Self-management
Carer involvement
Care coordination within teams
Generic care planning
Continuity of care
Shared decision making
Behaviour and communication skills
Information sharing
Knowledge of patient

Psychometrics

Brief description ?
A brief description of the initially reported psychometric properties of the measure.
Both IC-PREMS were included within the 2013 National Audit of Intermediate Care (Teale & Young, 2015). This meant that return rates, acceptability and scalability could be tested through a large sample, as over 250 services and over 6,000 patients are involved in this audit. The return rate for the bed-based IC PREM was 28% and the return rate for the home-based IC PREM was 13%. The higher rate for the bed-based IC-PREM was thought to be due to there being a different distribution method for this measure (by hand to the patient, rather than by post or by hand to the manager of the home-based service). Findings suggested that both measures were sensitive to differentiated care experiences. The low rate of missing data suggested that both IC-PREMS were acceptable to users. However, certain items were missed in both settings and refinement of these items was regarded as necessary by the developers.
Co-developed with patients ?
Whether the measure was co-developed with patients, a critical stage in the design and implementation of truly person-centred measures.
Y
CTT or IRT ?
Whether the measure uses Classical Test Theory, or the newer Item Response Theory
IRT